From list@liszt.debian.org Tue Mar 11 13:10:41 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: teamarch@teams-archive.debian.net Delivered-To: teamarch@teams-archive.debian.net Received: from liszt.debian.org (liszt.debian.org [82.195.75.100]) by durin.farm.ftbfs.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 017E644DB46 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:10:41 +0100 (CET) Received: by liszt.debian.org (Postfix, from userid 38) id 5E68813A63CD; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:03:19 +0000 (UTC) Old-Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on liszt.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,LDO_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Original-To: lists-debian-kernel@liszt.debian.org Delivered-To: lists-debian-kernel@liszt.debian.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B75613A63CD for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:03:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from liszt.debian.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lists.debian.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 2525) with ESMTP id 23685-42 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:02:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rietz.debian.org (rietz.debian.org [140.211.166.43]) by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87C0113A63B9; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:02:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from debbugs by rietz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JZ39K-0004uQ-D5; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:00:06 +0000 X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#470213: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686: Lack of bnx2 driver Reply-To: Laurent Bonnaud , 470213@bugs.debian.org Resent-From: Laurent Bonnaud Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-CC: Debian Kernel Team Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:00:05 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: X-Debian-PR-Message: report 470213 X-Debian-PR-Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686 X-Debian-PR-Keywords: X-Debian-PR-Source: linux-2.6 Received: via spool by 470213-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B470213.120523668814979 (code B ref 470213); Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:00:05 +0000 Received: (at 470213) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Mar 2008 11:58:08 +0000 Received: from bal.lis.inpg.fr ([195.220.21.15]) by rietz.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JZ37Q-0003ps-Kw for 470213@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:58:08 +0000 Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.fr (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [195.220.21.17]) by bal.lis.inpg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05C8EAAC6 for <470213@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:58:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpc.lis.inpg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56612C8029 for <470213@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:58:02 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at lis.inpg.Fr Received: from smtpc.lis.inpg.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtpc.lis.inpg.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y3KCzwTpF5DZ for <470213@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:57:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.178] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpc.lis.inpg.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4642C8012 for <470213@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:57:58 +0100 (CET) From: Laurent Bonnaud To: 470213@bugs.debian.org In-Reply-To: <20080311094812.GO22054@baikonur.stro.at> References: <1205226770.11636.31.camel@localhost> <20080311094812.GO22054@baikonur.stro.at> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:57:26 +0100 Message-Id: <1205236646.11636.52.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:00:06 +0000 X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank en-ht X-Amavis-Spam-Status: No, score=-7 tagged_above=3.6 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5] X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01 X-Rc-Spam: 2007-10-04_01 X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/36041 X-Loop: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org List-Id: List-URL: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list Resent-Sender: debian-kernel-request@lists.debian.org On Tue, 2008-03-11 at 10:48 +0100, maximilian attems wrote: > > how about you start to test current trunk instead of just annoyling > moan -> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianKernel > 2.6.25-rc4 Great ! I am glad to learn that the bnx2 module is back in Debian kernels. Unfortunately servers that have bnx2 chipsets are so called "production" NFS servers where testing -rc kernels is very risky and my test machines where I can install -rc kernels do not have a bnx2 chipset :<. I will test the 2.6.25 kernel as soon as it is declared stable by Linus... PS: sorry for my annoying moan :>. -- Laurent Bonnaud. http://www.lis.inpg.fr/pages_perso/bonnaud/