On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 03:10:24PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:49:35PM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 02:43:22PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> >
> > > Would you be amenable to the following update for wireless-tools for
> > > etchnahalf?
> > >
> > > Up WE_VERSION_MAX to 22.
> > [...]
> > > the upstream author believes no incompatibilities were introduced in
> > > WE 22:
> > > http://teams.debian.net/lurker/message/20080104.182703.557bed3b.it.html
> > >
> > > Upping WE_VERSION_MAX to 22 tells wireless-tools that it is
> > > forward-compatible with version 22 of WE and silences the scary
> > > warning to the user.
> >
> > Sure, that's OK with me. Do I have to do something?
>
> Thanks for the speedy reply!
> Here are the next steps - handle any of the pieces you want to and
> feel free to lob any/all of them back at me.
>
> 1) Send the patch to debian-release, asking for permission to upload
> to stable (good to put "[stable]" in the subject)
> 2) Assuming approval, prepare a package with an etchnhalf version
> (I'd recommend 28-1+etchnhalf.1 or similar - having 'etchnhalf'
> in the version is a requirement) and a target distribution of
> 'stable'. And obviously this should be built in a clean etch
> environment.
> 3) Test (if you want me to do this, i'd appreciate any suggested test
> cases you have)
> 4) Upload :)
hey Guus,
Would you like me to handle the upload?
--
dann frazier
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to project-etchnahalf-unsubscribe@???.
(text/plain)